declaration by the ʹStruggle Associationʹ, an underground Maoist organization in China
The truck driversʹ strike took place on June 8, two days prior to the planned date. As of now, this spontaneous strike wave has rapidly spread to Jiangxi, Shandong, Sichuan, Chongqing, Shanghai, Anhui, Hubei, Zhejiang, and other provinces, elevating the strike to a national level. Truck drivers from all over the country have blocked major road with protest banners attached to their vehicles, demanding higher transport prices, lower fuel prices, improvement in living and working conditions, and abolish the panorama of collusive monopoly, arbitrary fines, and constantly changing policies. According to the drivers on strike, the strike would last for at least ten days, and they will not give up until the regime concedes to their demands.
The transport prices of truck drivers have barely increased since 2000. However, fuel prices have been constantly increasing, not mentioning the incessant tolling and arbitrary fines by the police… The harsh reality forced truck drivers to desperately seek for their livelihood: processing as many orders as they can, driving for 12 hours per day or more, and taking less than two days of break every month. Truck drivers are only able to use National Highways as the incessant tolling of freeways makes their runs no longer profitable. Nonetheless, the National Highway network covers many dangerous roads: combined with fatigue caused by longer driving hours, staying concentrated has become a harder task for truck drivers. As a result, fatal accidents are now a common occurrence. Other drivers are also beset with numerous occupational illnesses and injuries. Truck driving has gradually become a high-risk occupation. Furthermore, the already insufficient wages the drivers risked their lives for are running out after subtracting fees incurred from all kinds of tolls and gas from their earnings, making them no longer able to sustain the lives of themselves and their family.
Other than this, what made the situation completely intolerable for the Chinese truck drivers was the monopoly of Manbang Corporation – the result of a merger between ʹYun Man Manʹ and ʹHuo Che Bangʹ, two biggest companies in the transportation sector – over the market through its control of mobile applications, which again lowered the meager transportation prices. Mr. Li, a striking truck driver, stated, ʹAll of us drivers (using the database app of ʹManbang Corpʹ) must pay about 1,000 to 3,000 yuan per year to continue using their service. 10 messages cost 688 yuan. Another thing that pains us is the referral fee. We are truck drivers; cargo owners look for trucks through the platform: say they agree to pay 2,000 yuan when communicating with the platform, but Yun Man Man would only give us 1,500 to 1,800 yuan when we contact them, taking off the surplus. Now the prices are getting lower and lower to the extent that we literally canʹt run anymore.ʹ
The genuine revolutionary Marxist-Leninist-Maoists firmly support this strike by our trucker brothers and sisters!
Strike is an indeprivable right and a weapon of struggle exercised and took up by every worker exploited by the bourgeoisie. This ongoing great truck driversʹ strike is one of the first nationwide large-scale strikes in decades. Its importance is not limited to the truck drivers alone, but also to the working masses of every arduous trade in all of China. It made clear the fact that Chinese workers dare to break through the prevailing white terror of the bourgeoisie and challenge corrupt bureaucrats and capitalists on the streets, carrying forward a collective resistance. The recovering rebelling spirit of the Chinese proletariat is finally reflected in the tremendous class hatred through concrete actions of the nationwide struggle against monopoly capitalism.
However, it must be held true both painfully and certainly, that this strike would ultimately end in a tragic defeat. But the brave trucker brothers and sisters are not the ones to blame.
This strike is a spontaneous struggle of dissatisfied truck drivers. However, due to the fact that there exists no real nationwide labor unions entrusted by the workers to jointly organize the strike effort, to coordinate strikes in each province, to notify the masses of the immediate situation of the strike and inspire more social strata to join the struggle, to provide accurate directions and notifications, and to send teams of agitators among the the truck driver masses to educate and agitate, this strike is doomed to be isolated, disorganized, and therefore easily broken up and struck down one by one; this dissatisfaction would deplete and the resolve would waver in but a few days. On the other hand, the bourgeoisie who has control over the state machinery has the tightest organization.
The reactionaries are well aware of this. Starting from yesterday, three days after the start of the strike, the police has pressured striking truck drivers in all directions and tried to create division among the strikers: many truck drivers who planned to go on strike were forced to capitulate under heavy pressure and went back to driving, cargo transport businesses in many locations have resumed operations, severely weakening the strength of the strikers, making it no longer possible to cause national price fluctuations and force the authorities to concede through the stoppage of cargo transportation.
Facing the prospect of failure, the most urgent thing in front of revolutionary Marxist-Leninist-Maoists is not to fill oneself with indignation of the authorities (anyone could easily do that), but self-criticisms in a serious manner.
The fundamental cause for the strike to fail at any moment is the lack of a labor union or a revolutionary organization belongs to the workers capable of coordinate and inspire strikes. A strike without the leadership of such a strong revolutionary organization, even though participated broadly and valiantly by workers, is unable to conquer victory, as its scattered and indefinite strength is unable to stay either protracted or concentrated. There are no weapons of theory capable of reshaping the world sharper than Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, but most domestic ʹMarxist-Leninist-Maoistsʹ, although branding it as their ʹbeliefsʹ, are completely unable to apply it through practice, not mentioning have never tried in a serious manner to build a nationwide revolutionary organization united with the workers. This long period of inactivity not only excluded and alienated Marxist-Leninist-Maoists from political struggle, but also disabled the masses of the ability to mount any resistance when they developed class consciousness themselves, making most basic economic strikes like this not only unable to succeed, but also confronted by the danger of repression. If the revolutionaries arenʹt organized tightly, the masses canʹt be organized, and if the masses arenʹt organized, thoughts for any victory, including economic gains in strikes, are delusive under the fascist dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.
The bleak current situation is: if the liberation of the Chinese proletariat, a giant, depends on its two legs: the left leg is the seasoned proletarian revolutionary organization, and the right leg is the rebellious consciousness of the proletarian masses. Neither leg is strong enough, nonetheless, the left leg, comparing to its counterpart, is severely dysplastic, and this symptom in turn restrained the growth of the right leg, as it constituted a ʹLi Tieguai-styleʹ giant: due to its disability, every step of this giant – who was supposed to conquer everything – towards victory became this difficult, every resistance against the oppressors became this hopeless, tripping on almost every step, and finally, ended up all black and blue. The reality has shown, that the dilemma faced by the masses risen up in revolt and strike is precisely caused by this group of pseudo-revolutionaries in their armchairs for years doing nothing. Currently, the degree of organization of revolutionary Marxist-Leninist-Maoists in our country is still close to zero, making an unequal match with the working massesʹ – spontaneously striking and resisting – dissatisfaction with the current system.
Regarding economic strikes, it should be realized that even their victories wouldnʹt solve the fundamental problem of exploitation: this would at most reduce fuel prices temporarily, increase transportation costs temporarily, limit embezzlement temporarily, and improve the living condition of workers temporarily, but the bourgeoisie, who appears to have taken a step back, would soon once more seize all fruits of victories from these economic strikes using the state that it clutches tightly in its hands when the workers scatter after their supposed ʹvictoriesʹ. When class consciousness of the people has yet to develop and revolutionary organizations have yet to mature, economic strikes can be a viable choice to train the masses to struggle against the bourgeoisie; but if the workers are to smash the bourgeoisieʹs shackles once and for all, the only way forward is to launch large-scale political strikes, expand the political rights of the workers, and set the aim on the conquest of power, the reshaping of the society, in other words, to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat and abolish the fascist dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, as well as the relation of production that exploits the workers and market economy under private ownership that it defends, and replace them with a planned economy under common ownership that utilizes all wealth to serve the livelihood of the people. In China, to commence political strikes without taking up arms is absolutely hopeless, just like to commence economic strikes without organization is hopeless as well.
After the truckers started the strike, a group of suit-wearing ʹdemocratsʹ who have been propagating for the American-style ʹdemocracyʹ raised their voices in support in their villas, as if they represent the interest of the worker masses – we cannot be fooled by them! We cannot forget what kind of trash those neoliberal ʹdemocratsʹ worshiping capitalist ʹdemocracyʹ are. We can expose the disguise of those so-called ʹdemocratsʹ just like poking through a house of paper by looking at whatʹs really going on in the noble example of their ʹdemocracyʹ, the United States. If it were to be said that ʹdistinctionsʹ exist between China and the US, then, the only distinction is their distinct forms of ʹdemocracyʹ: one is where the bourgeoisie appointing ʹpeopleʹs representativesʹ from top to bottom in plain sight, forbidding anyone from resisting and striking; and the other is where the bourgeoisie, through a self-directed farce of democracy, let the masses ʹelectʹ senators representing the interest of the bourgeoisie. In the ʹdemocraticʹ US under its dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, the workers are also being exploited, also lacking a discourse, also facing the repression of the police, also living in slums, and since the ascension of Trump, even the robe of ʹdemocracyʹ and the handful of ʹdemocratic rightsʹ are being torn apart by the capitalists themselves. It can be observed, that what those holier-than-thou ʹdemocratsʹ wish to have is but another form of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie with another layer of ʹdemocracyʹ: this system would only continue to worsen the conditions of the workers, even placing China under the control of the US bourgeoisie again.
In the eyes of many, a third choice doesnʹt exist besides the Western capitalist ʹdemocracyʹ and the capitalist fascism which is ruling China right now. This way, the masses are either used by the capitalist ʹdemocracyʹ or the capitalist fascism. But a third choice exists, and it is only not recognized by the broad masses of people because the revolutionaries havenʹt put in enough work. Any type of capitalist states is the oppressor of the broad masses of people. The only road that can liberate the working people is the elevation of the proletariat to the position of ruling class and the proletarian revolution towards global communism. This requires the proletariat to struggle without being subjected or used by any force not a part of proletariat itself.
We canʹt expect too much whether this nationwide truck driversʹ strike would solve anything, but it is a great beginning of a new era of the awakening of the Chinese proletariat. Regardless of how much the bourgeoisie tries to block information regarding this strike, they cannot erase the deep impression it left on the masses. It brought a whirlwind of struggle to a China almost suffocating from the capitalist fascist dictatorship; the spontaneous nationwide action of truck drivers stirred the sleeping backwater of the Chinese workers movement; but the dilemma that came immediately after it rang a bell for us Marxist-Leninist-Maoists.
This bell warned us that we have fallen behind the masses on the way to revolution, and the masses are facing defeat because of this. It is warning us to immediately engage in concrete struggles, to take up the role of organizing workers all over the country; it is warning us to dare to hold ourselves responsible for every failure, to organize ourselves into a national revolutionary organization, and with this leverage, organize the proletariat into a giant that will win the complete victory in liberating itself.
Long live the national truck driversʹ strike!
(source: www.redspark.nu/en/imperialist-states/china-long-live-the-national-truck-drivers-strike/)Keywords : maoists, china, truck driversʹ strike, marxist, leninist
No. of visitors : 232
చైనాలో భారీ ప్రేలుడు... ధ్వంసమైన 5800 కార్లు
చైనాలోని బీజింగ్ ప్రాంతం టియాంజిన్ లో ఓ భారీ ప్రేలుడు సంభవించింది. ఈ ప్రమాదంలో దాదాపు 5800 జాగోవర్ ల్యాండ్ రోవర్ కార్లు ధ్వంసం అయినట్లు భారత మాతృ సంస్థ, టాటా మోటార్ కంపెనీ, బాంబే స్టాక్ ఎక్సేంజ్ సమాచారం....
ఆ వాహనాలు సడెన్ గా గాల్లోకి ఎందుకు లేచాయి ?
అది బిజీ రోడ్డు వాహనాలు స్పీడ్ గా వెళ్తున్నాయి. సడెన్ గా ఓ మూడు వాహనాలు గాల్లోకి లేచాయి. ఏమైందో ఎవ్వరికీ అర్దం కాలేదు. ఆ దృశ్యాలు సీసీటీవీలో రికార్డయ్యాయి....
చైనా ఒక నూతన సోషల్ సామ్రాజ్యవాద శక్తి - మావోయిస్టు పార్టీ
వెనుకబడిన దేశాల ప్రజలను సోషలిజం పేరుతో మోసగిసూ, తన సోషల్-సామ్రాజ్యవాద ప్రయోజనాలను చైనా నెరవేర్చుకుంటున్నది. చైనాలో ఉన్న ప్రభుత్వరంగ సంస్థలను (ఎస్ఓఈలు) చూపించి పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానాన్ని "సోషలిజంగా గందరగోళపెట్టడం రివిజనిస్టులకు మామూలే....